Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25585664-20150113025634/@comment-26138305-20150301140007

49.148.15.16 wrote: That is two different examples altogether. It's an obvious, simple observation compared to an observation that can only be given by a professional. It's like comparing "I know that person is cheerful," versus someone who has a certain special condition or a complicated illness. In this case, it's a mental disorder. It's not fair to compare "This person is a sadist," versus "This person is autistic."

Unless a certified health student/doctor/psychiatrist proves to us with full details and professional citations or explanations that Inaho is autistic, it's not safe nor okay to assume that he is. Autism is a serious and deep topic that gets a lot of misunderstanding. It's not wise to diagnose someone, regardless of the fact they are fictional or not, with a disease/condition/illness that one doesn't have full awareness or understanding of. Reading the wiki doesn't mean that you understand completely what autism is. It takes actual medical study and/or a personal connection to autistic people to be able to really know what autism really is. Ignorant people really need to stop playing with medical conditions.

In the end, it's a fan-based observation that doesn't have a solid structure to stand on aside from said fan observations. It's not categorized as canon because it's not recognized by the characters, the novels, the side mangas, or in the interviews. Forgot to log-in. That was me.